ForumsGeneral › Class Discussion Continued
Class Discussion Continued
Mizzouse Oct 18, 2018 95 replies 1741 views
« 1 3 4 5
A
⭐ x2 Kays Krew 3
I mean I guess it’s my bad for not seeing Eric’s bump but I was online and literally had no idea there was a meeting until I was mid sb and had nobody message me. Either way it doesn’t really matter if I showed or not imo this is community run and everyone should be able to have a voice for changes not just a panel of advisers
A
⭐ x2 Kays Krew 3
Emperor wrote:
You've repeated yourself 4x, but it doesn't explain your posts on the matter at all. You can't go "I agree with the changes, but I'll need to test the changes" to "I had no idea about the changes" And then try to explain it as you were talking about Manu had no idea...you didn't say Manu ...
It’s called being passive aggressive because it was not publicly announced where it should be so people didn’t see it.
M
OP
No it is correct, show me a thread where the link to the discord channel is there? Cuz it ain't in assemble nerds!. He messaged chica the link in game then when the meeting was taking place, me and dp both said what's the link and got no answer. I had to tell chica next to me to tell Eric on the discord for it. That's why we were late. But before that there was no discussion about changes at all with the rest of the staff including some advisors.
Now that the story is straight, hellspawn is tinkering with the Nader to get it right with our input and me trying to help.
Advisor 💎 x13 🔱 Monkey Business CO
The assemble nerds post was to give a time and date. Your wife was there so if she can get there on time how could you not if she was right next to you?

The discord was made right before the meeting took place(which is on me) but once dp got out of yalls sb I gave him the link. It was never hidden or refused to be given to anyone.

Now that the story is straight im glad to see the "godly dev" assess the changes without testing them in a SB setting :D I wish you the best of luck.
C
⭐ x1 👑 Gentlemen
All this BS and no one is talking about sniper. No wonder the game is shit.
M
OP
"Minac the god of assets." I never said I was but he taught me a lot and yes I don't need to test them in an sb when your team that never logs off and mg are doing it for us. Simply by watching and getting feedback from them is all I need. I don't need the whole server to test it to know it's shit, 2/3rds of the squads is fine.
C
⭐ x1 👑 Gentlemen
Mizzouse wrote:
"Minac the god of assets." I never said I was but he taught me a lot and yes I don't need to test them in an sb when your team that never logs off and mg are doing it for us. Simply by watching and getting feedback from them is all I need. I don't need the whole server to test it to know it's shit, ...
Go to bed fake ass sniper. You’re not even pushing for more ammo.
S
Arguing / Lying... 2 great things to failure
P
Referee ⭐ x2 🔱 good guys
u guys might want to listen to this to calm down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isqOVK4G4fc&
L
🔱 Clique CO
Lmg - just give the class a law and be done with it

Med - no steron

Ripper - +1 damage

Nader - bounce with initial shot being in close proximity

Specop - get rid of it

Sniper - get rid of it


That being said:


After all is said and done, and we are a few weeks into the season players will realize the changes arent enough to make people use the classes. The majority will revert back to marine and the same points will be brought up during the next off season.
Webmaster 👑 x24 👑 Gentlemen CO
I would not give LMG a LAW. All you're doing is turning LMG into Marine with a bigger clip and that's boring.
S
If we are limited to one per team, why wouldnt you make LMG stronger than marine? It either needs a LAW, or the same short reload as Marine to make any sense
L
🔱 Clique CO
Champion wrote:
I would not give LMG a LAW. All you're doing is turning LMG into Marine with a bigger clip and that's boring.
Then they should get the mini law that HS gave rocketeer and dont give them the ability to use regular laws.

No buffing of the mini at all.
Webmaster 👑 x24 👑 Gentlemen CO
Sin wrote:
If we are limited to one per team, why wouldnt you make LMG stronger than marine? It either needs a LAW, or the same short reload as Marine to make any sense
Because if you're trying to get people to play <b>support</b> classes by making them stronger than Marine then you're doing it wrong.

The whole idea behind LMG is to lay down cover/support fire for your team in chokes and to help hold. Which has always done just fine the way it is. I believe HS added in an LMG gun with less spread/recoil which should help. I just think we should still try to keep class identity intact with the changes we make.
E
Gonna agree with Tox. LMG should still be very different than Marine. Adding a LAW just makes it a stronger Marine basically.

I would maybe shorten the reload time though like Sinnage suggested.
Webmaster 👑 x24 👑 Gentlemen CO
I wouldn't be opposed to giving LMG incin nades or something to shake it up but I feel like LMG has always been just fine.
« 1 3 4 5