ForumsGeneral › Message from MP
Message from MP
Homelander Apr 1, 2025 15 replies 400 views
H
OP Zone Developer 🛡️ x1
https://youtu.be/1aJjSPHV1G0
F
League Administrator ⭐ x1 🔱 🥉 good guys
Thank you very much MP for investigating these allegations and clearing my name; facts are facts.
H
League Analyst ⭐ x7 🤝 🥈 Gentlemen
counter sue Pistor for defamation ? False accusations trying to boost ratings

Fake news after dark can’t be trusted
⭐ x4 💎 🥉
Fausto found innocent after a hefty donation, eh?

lol great stuff MP
P
⭐ x11 🔱 Gentlemen C
hvk wrote:
counter sue Pistor for defamation ? False accusations trying to boost ratings Fake news after dark can’t be trusted
Legal precedent shows that conspiracy does not require Whois command to be completed, only that there was intent and agreement to commit it.

F
League Administrator ⭐ x1 🔱 🥉 good guys
hvk wrote:
counter sue Pistor for defamation ? False accusations trying to boost ratings Fake news after dark can’t be trusted
I should proceed with this. Defamation of character is punishable by law. The extent that some people will go to is evident; unfortunately some choose to utilize their time by ways of malicious behavior.
Edited Apr 1, 2025
P
⭐ x11 🔱 Gentlemen C
I’m using your own audio without altering it or taking it out of context, then it’s unlikely to be defamation.

We can let the lawyers handle it
F
League Administrator ⭐ x1 🔱 🥉 good guys
P wrote:
I’m using your own audio without altering it or taking it out of context, then it’s unlikely to be defamation. We can let the lawyers handle it
Not when you provided your personal opinion before and after the fact on multiple platforms. Discord, various channels and then took to YouTube. That is in fact defamation
P
⭐ x11 🔱 Gentlemen C
Fausto wrote:
Not when you provided your personal opinion before and after the fact on multiple platforms. Discord, various channels and then took to YouTube. That is in fact defamation
So you’re saying I can’t share my personal opinion along with the audio? We can let the Infantry Lawyers Rom/Leak take a look—I’m curious. But here in the great United States of America, we have something called freedom of speech where personal opinion can’t be considered defamation.

⭐ x4 💎 🥉
We have two lawyers here? We can have a USL courtroom!
F
League Administrator ⭐ x1 🔱 🥉 good guys
I think you’re confusing the gist of the argument. No one is saying you can’t provide an opinion or use your “right” to freedom of speech. A personal opinion can be defamatory regardless if it comes from your point of view or not. Same reason tabloids get sued all the time for defamatory comments.

Regardless, your so called “dark topic” was found null and void, filled with personal opinion and a motive to spark drama.
L
Advisor ⭐ x4 🥈 Monkey Business C
don’t want to throw myself in the middle of this but just want to clarify opinions technically cannot be categorized as defamatory, it must be a false statement of fact
R
Head Commentator ⭐ x2 👑 Kays Krew 3
And then we get into the whole Gertz analysis of whether or not for this arena Fausto would qualify as a limited purpose public figure and whether or not the violation would require the finding of actual malice on the part of Pistor.

The bar for proving a case of defamation or slander is really, really high which is why no attorney represents themselves as a "Defamation Attorney" as they do with Personal Injury, Criminal Defense, Trusts and Estates, Elder Law, etc.
L
Advisor ⭐ x4 🥈 Monkey Business C
thanks Rom. that’ll be $550/hour billed to Rom & Leak LLC
H
League Analyst ⭐ x7 🤝 🥈 Gentlemen
Mike Ross wins the case
1
⭐ x4 🥉 Kays Krew 3
Leak wrote:
don’t want to throw myself in the middle of this but just want to clarify opinions technically cannot be categorized as defamatory, it must be a false statement of fact
I dont know anything about it... but saying things like, in my opinion, i think, etc. Is not really defamation, more like saying what you say, as a fact. Instead of, they are this, he did this, he is that, etc. And it leaves the person suing open to getting fucked up. They have to prove it is defamation.